Influence of Different Testing Methods on the Thermal Shock Resistance of Alumina Castable Samples

Christos G. Aneziris1, Yaowu Wei2, Nan Li2

1 TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Institute of Ceramic, Glass and Construction Materials,
2 The Key State Laboratory Breeding Base of Refractories and Ceramics Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 430081 Wuhan/China

Revision 05.02.2013, 15.03.2013

Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 107-112


The thermal shock resistance of self-flow alumina based castables is investigated due to natural cooling, compressed air cooling and water cooling (quench) methods respectively. The residual Young’s modulus as well the residual bending strength are taken into account in order to compare the influence of different testing methods on the results. The pore size distribution, SEM analysis and computerized tomography are used to assist the study. The integrity of the sample is damaged dramatically by the application of water quenching test and does not reflect the real state of the thermal shock resistance of the castables in practice. The results based on compressed air cooling (quench) method are similar with that based on natural cooling process and are suitable to evaluate the thermal shock performance of the alumina castable samples.


thermal shock resistance, testing methods, alumina castables


[1] Boccaccini, D.N.; et al.: Determination of thermal shock resistance in refractory materials by ultrasonic pulse velocity measurement. J. of Europ. Ceram. Soc. 27 (2007) 1859–1863 [2] Damhofa, F.; et al.: Experimental analysis of the evolution of thermal shock damage using transit time measurement of ultrasonic waves. J. of the Europ. Ceram. Soc. 29 (2009) 1309– 1322 [3] Zhongqiu, Li; et al.: Microstructure, mechanical properties and thermal shock resistance of ZrO2-LaPO4 composites. J. of Alloys and Compounds 480 (2009) 863–866 [4] Xinghong Zhang; et al.: Modification and valid ation of the thermal shock parameter for cer am ic matrix composites under water quench ing condition. Mater. and Design 30 (2009) 4552–4556 [5] Posarac, M.; et al.: The ultrasonic and image analysis method for non-destructive quantification of the thermal shock damage in refractory specimens. Mater. and Design 30 (2009) 3338–3343 [6] Marenovic, S.; et al.: Thermal shock damage characterization of refractory composites. Ceram. Int. 34 (2008) 1925–1929 [7] Akiyama, S.; et al.: Thermal shock strength of Al2O3 by laser irradiation method. Ceram. Int. 27 (2001) 171–177 [8] Aksel, C.; Warren, P.D.: Thermal shock param - eters [R, R’’’ and R’’’’] of magnesia-spinel composites. J. of the Europ. Ceram. Soc. 23 (2003) 301–308 [9] Pettersson, P.; et al.: Parameters for measuring the thermal shock of ceramic materials with an indentation-quench method. J. of the Europ.. Ceram. S. 22 (2002) 1883–1889 [10] Collin, M.; Rowcliffe, D.: Analysis and prediction of thermal shock in brittle materials. Acta Mater. 48 (2000) 1655–1665 [11] Posarac, M.; Dimitrijevic, M.: Determination of thermal shock resistance of silicon carbide/ cordierite composite material using nondestruc - tive test methods. J. of the Europ. Ceram. Soc. 28 (2008) 1275–1278 [12] Absi, J.; Glandus., J.C.: Improved method for severe thermal shocks testing of ceramics by water quenching. J. of the Europ. Ceram. Soc. 24 (2004) 2835–2838 [13] Volkov-Husović, T.D.; Jančić, R.M.: Thermal shock behavior of alumina based refractories: fracture resistance parameters and water quench test. Mater. Letters 38 (1999) 372– 378 [14] Schmitt, N.; Burr, A.: Micromechanics applied to the thermal shock behavior of refractory cer - am ics. Mechanics of Mater. 34 (2002) 725– 747 [15] Zhaoyou, C.: Prediction and evaluation on thermal shock resistance of refractories. Re - frac tories (Chinese) 22 (1987) 50 [16] Hubálková, J.; Silva, W.M.; Aneziris, C.G.: X-Ray computed tomography as a tool for investi - gation of refractories. Proc. of 53rd Int. Coll. on Refractories 2010, Aachen, Germany, 49–52


Göller Verlag GmbH