Key Aspects on Refractories for Molten Aluminium Long-distance Delivery

A. Fornaziero1, M. A. L. Braulio1, V. C. Pandolfelli2, D. R. G. Oliveira3, J. B. Gallo3

1 Alcoa Latin America and Caribbean, (FIRE Associate Company), 37719-900 Poços de Caldas/Brazil
2 Materials Microstructural Engineering, Group (FIRE Associate Laboratory), Federal University of São Carlos,13565-905 São Carlos/Brazil
3 Alcoa Latin America and Caribbean, (FIRE Associate Company), 37719-900 Poços de Caldas/Brazil

Revision 14.01.2013, 15.06.2013

Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 105 - 108

Abstract

The long distance (100–200 km) molten aluminum transportation (~8 Mt/trip) is a breakthrough process, which has benefits for both suppliers and customers. Among various advantages, the reduction in the customer’s ingot inventory, in the energy costs and the benefits of not re-melting must be pointed out. Regarding energy savings, an increase in the delivering aluminum temperature is welcome as it reduces the homogenization time in the customer’s furnace, increasing its productivity. In order to attain this objective, the refractory’s thermal insulation design, the crucible’s pre-heating profile and their maintenance procedure are key parameters. In this work, these aspects will be addressed, highlighting the relevant role of refractories in order to attain the customer’s target. It will be shown that refractory projects involve a systemic analysis, comprising not only a suitable selection of material but also application and maintenance aspects.

Keywords

molten metal delivery, energy savings, thermal efficiency

References

[1] Peterson, R.D.; Blagg, G.G. Transportation of molten aluminum. Proc. of Recycling of Metals and Engin. Mater. TMS (2000) 857– 866 [2] Beelen, C.M.; Bol, L.C.G.M.: Observations on the wear of refractory linings in aluminium remelting furnaces. Proc. of Int. Coll. on Refractories Aachen, 1995, 113–117 [3] Siljan, O.J.; et al.: Refractories for molten aluminium contact. Part I: Thermodynamics and kinetics. Proc. of UNITECR 2001, Cancún/MX (2001) 531–550 [4] Siljan, O.J.; Schøning, C.: Refractories for molten aluminium contact. Part II: Influence of pore size on aluminium penetration. Proc. of UNITECR 2001, Cancún/MX (2001) 551–571 [5] Ratle, A.; et al.: Correlations between thermal shock and mechanical impact resistance of refractories. British Ceramic Transactions 96 (1997) [6] 225–230 [6] Ferguson, E.: Practical heat loss calculations for molten metal transport crucibles. Proc. of Advances in Refractories for the Metallurgical Industries IV. Eds. M. Rigaud, C. Allaire, CIM, Canada, 2004 [7] Allen, A.W.: Heat transfer mechanisms in refractory materials. Refractories Applications and News 10 (2005) [1] 27–31 [8] Bonadia, P.; et al.: Refractory selection for long-distance molten aluminum delivery. Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 85 (2006) 9301–9309 [9] He, X.; et al.: High emissivity coatings for high temperature applications: progress and prospect. Thin Solid Films 517 (2009) 5120– 5129 [10] Bonadia, P.; Gallo, J.B.; Pandolfelli, V.C.: The thermal insulation of aluminum electrolytic cells. refractories WORLDFORUM 1 (2009) [2] 132–140

Copyright

Göller Verlag GmbH